State v. Heavener

Supreme Court of South Carolina

State v. Heavener

143 S.E. 674, 146 S.C. 138, 1928 S.C. LEXIS 112

CourtSupreme Court of South Carolina

DecidedJune 12, 1928

Docket12464

StatusPublished

Cited by7 cases

This text of 143 S.E. 674 (State v. Heavener) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Heavener, 143 S.E. 674, 146 S.C. 138, 1928 S.C. LEXIS 112 (S.C. 1928).

Pincite

Opinions

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Beease.

The appellant was convicted in the Court of General Sessions of Greenville County for the crime of seduction under the promise of marriage. The appeal here raises the identical questions which were, raised by the appellant on his motion for a new trial. The order of the trial Judge, Hon. J. Henry Johnson, refusing the motion for a new trial, correctly disposes of all the questions raised on that motion, and, in our opinion, it also decides all the questions raised by the exceptions before this Court. The order of Judge Johnson, which will be reported, is adopted as the opinion of this Court.

The judgment of this Court is that the appeal be, and the same is hereby, dismissed.

Mr. ChiEE Justice Watts and Messrs. Justices Sta-beer and Carter concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Beease.

The appellant was convicted in the Court of General Sessions of Greenville County for the crime of seduction under the promise of marriage. The appeal here raises the identical questions which were, raised by the appellant on his motion for a new trial. The order of the trial Judge, Hon. J. Henry Johnson, refusing the motion for a new trial, correctly disposes of all the questions raised on that motion, and, in our opinion, it also decides all the questions raised by the exceptions before this Court. The order of Judge Johnson, which will be reported, is adopted as the opinion of this Court.

The judgment of this Court is that the appeal be, and the same is hereby, dismissed.

Mr. ChiEE Justice Watts and Messrs. Justices Sta-beer and Carter concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

143 S.E. 674, 146 S.C. 138, 1928 S.C. LEXIS 112, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-heavener-sc-1928.

Opinions

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack