State v. Heavener

143 S.E. 674, 146 S.C. 138, 1928 S.C. LEXIS 112
Supreme Court of South Carolina·Decided June 12, 1928·No. 12464·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinions

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Beease.

The appellant was convicted in the Court of General Sessions of Greenville County for the crime of seduction under the promise of marriage. The appeal here raises the identical questions which were, raised by the appellant on his motion for a new trial. The order of the trial Judge, Hon. J. Henry Johnson, refusing the motion for a new trial, correctly disposes of all the questions raised on that motion, and, in our opinion, it also decides all the questions raised by the exceptions before this Court. The order of Judge Johnson, which will be reported, is adopted as the opinion of this Court.

The judgment of this Court is that the appeal be, and the same is hereby, dismissed.

Mr. ChiEE Justice Watts and Messrs. Justices Sta-beer and Carter concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Heavener, 143 S.E. 674, 146 S.C. 138, 1928 S.C. LEXIS 112 (S.C. 1928).

143 S.E. 674 (State v. Heavener) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ronald Bradford Waller v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee, 2000
State v. Stokes
528 S.E.2d 430 (Court of Appeals of South Carolina, 2000)
State v. Taylor
407 P.2d 59 (Arizona Supreme Court, 1965)
Harper v. Bolton
124 S.E.2d 54 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1962)
State v. Brown
32 S.E.2d 825 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1945)
Green v. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Helms
180 S.W.2d 865 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976), 1944)