State v. Heath
600 S.E.2d 858, 2004 WL 1638217
This text of 600 S.E.2d 858 (State v. Heath) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
State v. Heath, 600 S.E.2d 858, 2004 WL 1638217 (N.C. 2004).
Opinion
STATE
v.
Joseph Calvin HEATH.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Joseph Calvin Heath, Pro Se.
Kathryne L. VandenBerg, Raleigh, for Joseph Calvin Heath.
C. Branson Vickory, III, District Attorney, for State.
The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 9th day of July 2004 by Attorney General for Extension of Time to File Response to Motion for Appropriate Relief:
"Motion Allowed. Attorney General shall have up to and including the 2nd day of August 2004 to file response with this Court. By order of the Court in conference this the 9th day of July 2004."
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
600 S.E.2d 858, 2004 WL 1638217, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-heath-nc-2004.