State v. Headley

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Headley

566 S.W.3d 267

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedJanuary 29, 2019

DocketWD 80994

StatusPublished

This text of 566 S.W.3d 267 (State v. Headley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Headley, 566 S.W.3d 267 (Mo. Ct. App. 2019).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam

John Headley appeals his convictions and sentences for first-degree statutory sodomy and incest. He contends the evidence was insufficient to support the convictions. Upon review of the briefs and the *268record, we find no error and affirm the judgment. We have provided the parties with a Memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision, because a published opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose.

AFFIRMED. Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam

John Headley appeals his convictions and sentences for first-degree statutory sodomy and incest. He contends the evidence was insufficient to support the convictions. Upon review of the briefs and the *268record, we find no error and affirm the judgment. We have provided the parties with a Memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision, because a published opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose.

AFFIRMED. Rule 30.25(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

566 S.W.3d 267, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-headley-moctapp-2019.