State v. Headings

586 So. 2d 337, 16 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 672, 1991 Fla. LEXIS 1704, 1991 WL 201572
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided October 10, 1991·No. No. 76991·Published

Opinion

McDONALD, Justice.

Pursuant to article V, section 3(b)(4), Florida Constitution, we accepted jurisdiction of Headings v. State, 568 So.2d 533 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990), in which the district court certified the question of whether the inability of a criminal defendant to pay costs is a defense to the assessment of costs against that defendant. In State v. Vamper, 579 So.2d 730 (Fla.1991), and State v. Beasley, 580 So.2d 139 (Fla.1991), we held that costs may be assessed without a determination as to the defendant’s ability to pay. We accordingly quash that part of the opinion under review which denies [338]*338the assessment of costs and remand for reconsideration in light of Vamper and Beasley. We do not disturb any other portion of the decision under review.

It is so ordered.

SHAW, C.J., and OVERTON, BARRETT, GRIMES, KOGAN and HARDING, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Headings, 586 So. 2d 337, 16 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 672, 1991 Fla. LEXIS 1704, 1991 WL 201572 (Fla. 1991).

586 So. 2d 337 (State v. Headings) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Beasley
580 So. 2d 139 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1991)
State v. Vamper
579 So. 2d 730 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1991)
Headings v. State
568 So. 2d 533 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)