State v. Head

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Head

272 S.W.3d 312, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 1403, 2008 WL 4553072

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedOctober 14, 2008

DocketED 90571

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 272 S.W.3d 312 (State v. Head) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Head, 272 S.W.3d 312, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 1403, 2008 WL 4553072 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Eddie Head (Defendant) appeals from the judgment upon his conviction by a jury of two counts of robbery in the first degree, Section 569.020, RSMo 2000 1 ; one count of forcible rape, Section 566.030; and one count of kidnapping, Section 565.110. Defendant was sentenced to ten years imprisonment for each robbery count, fifteen years imprisonment for forcible rape, and twelve years imprisonment for kidnapping. The sentences for one count of robbery and the kidnapping were te run concurrently with each other, and all other counts were to run consecutively for a total of thirty seven years imprisonment. On appeal, Defendant argues the trial court erred in: (1) denying Defendant’s motion to dismiss improperly joined offenses, or, in the alternative, severance of offenses; and (2) informing the jury of charges against Defendant for which he was not being tried. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal and find the claim of error to be without merit. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law applicable to this case would serve no jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

1

. Unless otherwise indicated, all further statutory references are to RSMo 2000.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Eddie Head (Defendant) appeals from the judgment upon his conviction by a jury of two counts of robbery in the first degree, Section 569.020, RSMo 2000 1 ; one count of forcible rape, Section 566.030; and one count of kidnapping, Section 565.110. Defendant was sentenced to ten years imprisonment for each robbery count, fifteen years imprisonment for forcible rape, and twelve years imprisonment for kidnapping. The sentences for one count of robbery and the kidnapping were te run concurrently with each other, and all other counts were to run consecutively for a total of thirty seven years imprisonment. On appeal, Defendant argues the trial court erred in: (1) denying Defendant’s motion to dismiss improperly joined offenses, or, in the alternative, severance of offenses; and (2) informing the jury of charges against Defendant for which he was not being tried. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal and find the claim of error to be without merit. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law applicable to this case would serve no jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

1

. Unless otherwise indicated, all further statutory references are to RSMo 2000.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

272 S.W.3d 312, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 1403, 2008 WL 4553072, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-head-moctapp-2008.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack