State v. H.B. (In re Interest of H.B.)

North Dakota Supreme Court

State v. H.B. (In re Interest of H.B.)

923 N.W.2d 105

CourtNorth Dakota Supreme Court

DecidedFebruary 21, 2019

DocketNo. 20180439; No. 20180440; No. 20180441

StatusPublished

This text of 923 N.W.2d 105 (State v. H.B. (In re Interest of H.B.)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering North Dakota Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. H.B. (In re Interest of H.B.), 923 N.W.2d 105 (N.D. 2019).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

[¶1] J.B. and J.C. appealed from a juvenile court's orders terminating their parental rights to H.B., V.B., and A.B. J.B. and J.C. argue that the juvenile court erred in finding the conditions and causes of deprivation *106are likely to continue, that the children are suffering or will probably suffer serious physical, mental, moral, or emotional harm, and that Burleigh County Social Services failed to use reasonable efforts to reunify the children with J.B. and J.C. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2) and conclude that facts existed upon which the juvenile court could find deprivation would continue and reasonable efforts for reunification were present. See In Interest of A.B. , 2017 ND 178, ¶ 12, 898 N.W.2d 676 ("[w]e will not overturn a juvenile court's findings of fact in a termination proceeding unless the findings are clearly erroneous under N.D.R.Civ.P. 52(a).").

[¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.

Jon J. Jensen

Lisa Fair McEvers

Daniel J. Crothers

Jerod E. Tufte

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

[¶1] J.B. and J.C. appealed from a juvenile court's orders terminating their parental rights to H.B., V.B., and A.B. J.B. and J.C. argue that the juvenile court erred in finding the conditions and causes of deprivation *106are likely to continue, that the children are suffering or will probably suffer serious physical, mental, moral, or emotional harm, and that Burleigh County Social Services failed to use reasonable efforts to reunify the children with J.B. and J.C. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2) and conclude that facts existed upon which the juvenile court could find deprivation would continue and reasonable efforts for reunification were present. See In Interest of A.B. , 2017 ND 178, ¶ 12, 898 N.W.2d 676 ("[w]e will not overturn a juvenile court's findings of fact in a termination proceeding unless the findings are clearly erroneous under N.D.R.Civ.P. 52(a).").

[¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.

Jon J. Jensen

Lisa Fair McEvers

Daniel J. Crothers

Jerod E. Tufte

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

923 N.W.2d 105, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-hb-in-re-interest-of-hb-nd-2019.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack