State v. Hazelton
This text of 503 A.2d 700 (State v. Hazelton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Judicial Court of Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION.
Lester Hazelton appeals from a judgment of the Superior Court, York County, entered on a jury verdict of guilty of unlawful sexual contact in violation of 17-A M.R.S.A. § 255(1)(C) (Supp.1985-1986). He contends that the State violated its discovery obligations under M.R.Crim.P. 16(a)(1)(C) and that the court abused its discretion by denying his motion for continuance of the trial as a sanction for the claimed violation. Our review of the record discloses that there was no discovery violation by the State and that the court did not abuse its discretion by denying the requested continuance. See State v. Reed, 479 A.2d 1291, 1295 (Me.1984).
[701]*701The entry is:
Judgment affirmed.
All concurring.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
503 A.2d 700, 1986 Me. LEXIS 681, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-hazelton-me-1986.