State v. Hazel
747 S.E.2d 582, 367 N.C. 219, 2013 WL 4789276, 2013 N.C. LEXIS 933
Opinion
1. Defs NOA Based Upon a Constitutional Question (COA12-1102)
2. Defs PDR Under N.C.G.S. § 7A-31
3. State’s Motion to Dismiss Appeal
4. State’s Motion to Deem Response to NOA and PDR Timely Served
1. - --
2. Denied
3. Allowed
4. Allowed
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Hazel, 747 S.E.2d 582, 367 N.C. 219, 2013 WL 4789276, 2013 N.C. LEXIS 933 (N.C. 2013).
747 S.E.2d 582 (State v. Hazel) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Simmons
808 S.E.2d 306 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2017)