Home/Court of Appeals of Oregon/State v. Hazeem

State v. Hazeem

637 P.2d 938, 55 Or. App. 273, 1981 Ore. App. LEXIS 4066
CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon
DecidedDecember 21, 1981
DocketNos. C79-09-33039, C79-09-33098, C79-08-32938, CA 17762
StatusPublished

This text of 637 P.2d 938 (State v. Hazeem) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Hazeem, 637 P.2d 938, 55 Or. App. 273, 1981 Ore. App. LEXIS 4066 (Or. Ct. App. 1981).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Defendant contends the trial court erred in fixing the amount of restitution. We find no error. State v. Boswell, 52 Or App 535, 628 P2d 763, rev den 291 Or 419 (1981).

Defendant’s second and third assignments of error were not asserted nor excepted to at trial. Therefore, we decline to consider those assignments. State v. Coria, 39 Or App 507, 592 P2d 1057, rev.den 286 Or 449 (1979); State v. Newberry, 39 Or App 119, 591 P2d 404, rev den 286 Or 449 (1979); State v. Gaines, 27 Or App 69, 555 P2d 469 (1976), rev den 277 Or 1, cert denied, 431 US 916, 97 S Ct 2179, 53 L Ed 2d 227 (1977).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Coria
592 P.2d 1057 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1979)
State v. Boswell
628 P.2d 763 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1981)
State v. Gaines
555 P.2d 469 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1976)
State v. Newberry
591 P.2d 404 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1979)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
637 P.2d 938, 55 Or. App. 273, 1981 Ore. App. LEXIS 4066, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-hazeem-orctapp-1981.