State v. Haynes

Oregon Supreme Court

State v. Haynes

385 P.2d 622, 235 Or. 486, 1963 Ore. LEXIS 357

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Haynes. Read the opinion of the Court — 233 Or. 292 →

Oregon Supreme Court·Decided October 9, 1963·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Defendant moved the trial court to dismiss the indictment. He charged that he was not brought to trial [487]*487within a reasonable time. The conrt refused to dismiss and defendant appeals.

The case does not warrant a recital of the proceedings in the trial court. The record presents an attempt by defendant to utilize every technicality available to him to cause delay. Defendant was brought to trial within a reasonable time, OES 134.120. The appeal is without merit.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Defendant moved the trial court to dismiss the indictment. He charged that he was not brought to trial [487]*487within a reasonable time. The conrt refused to dismiss and defendant appeals.

The case does not warrant a recital of the proceedings in the trial court. The record presents an attempt by defendant to utilize every technicality available to him to cause delay. Defendant was brought to trial within a reasonable time, OES 134.120. The appeal is without merit.

Affirmed.

State v. Haynes, 385 P.2d 622, 235 Or. 486, 1963 Ore. LEXIS 357 (Or. 1963).

Pincite

385 P.2d 622 (State v. Haynes) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.