State v. Haynes

Oregon Supreme Court

State v. Haynes

385 P.2d 622, 235 Or. 486, 1963 Ore. LEXIS 357

DecidedOctober 9, 1963

StatusPublished

This text of 385 P.2d 622 (State v. Haynes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Oregon Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Haynes, 385 P.2d 622, 235 Or. 486, 1963 Ore. LEXIS 357 (Or. 1963).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Defendant moved the trial court to dismiss the indictment. He charged that he was not brought to trial [487]*487within a reasonable time. The conrt refused to dismiss and defendant appeals.

The case does not warrant a recital of the proceedings in the trial court. The record presents an attempt by defendant to utilize every technicality available to him to cause delay. Defendant was brought to trial within a reasonable time, OES 134.120. The appeal is without merit.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Defendant moved the trial court to dismiss the indictment. He charged that he was not brought to trial [487]*487within a reasonable time. The conrt refused to dismiss and defendant appeals.

The case does not warrant a recital of the proceedings in the trial court. The record presents an attempt by defendant to utilize every technicality available to him to cause delay. Defendant was brought to trial within a reasonable time, OES 134.120. The appeal is without merit.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

385 P.2d 622, 235 Or. 486, 1963 Ore. LEXIS 357, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-haynes-or-1963.