State v. Haynes

Ohio Supreme Court

State v. Haynes

2011 Ohio 5787, 130 Ohio St. 3d 360

Ohio Supreme Court·Decided November 15, 2011·No. 2011-1219·Published

Opinion

{¶ 1} The discretionary appeal is accepted.

{¶ 2} The cause is remanded to the court of appeals for application of State v. Williams, 129 Ohio St.3d 344, 2011-Ohio-3374, 952 N.E.2d 1108.

*361 Joseph T. Deters, Hamilton County Prosecuting Attorney, and Paula Adams, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee. Dinsmore & Shohl, L.L.P., and Michael J. Newman, Christopher R. McDowell, and Kurt R. Hunt, for appellant. O’Connor, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, Lanzinger, Cupp, and McGee Brown, JJ., concur. O’Donnell, J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

{¶ 1} The discretionary appeal is accepted.

{¶ 2} The cause is remanded to the court of appeals for application of State v. Williams, 129 Ohio St.3d 344, 2011-Ohio-3374, 952 N.E.2d 1108.

*361 Joseph T. Deters, Hamilton County Prosecuting Attorney, and Paula Adams, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee. Dinsmore & Shohl, L.L.P., and Michael J. Newman, Christopher R. McDowell, and Kurt R. Hunt, for appellant. O’Connor, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, Lanzinger, Cupp, and McGee Brown, JJ., concur. O’Donnell, J., dissents.

State v. Haynes, 2011 Ohio 5787, 130 Ohio St. 3d 360 (Ohio 2011).

Pincite

2011 Ohio 5787 (State v. Haynes) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related