Home/Ohio Supreme Court/State v. Haynes

State v. Haynes

2011 Ohio 5787, 130 Ohio St. 3d 360
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedNovember 15, 2011
Docket2011-1219
StatusPublished

This text of 2011 Ohio 5787 (State v. Haynes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Haynes, 2011 Ohio 5787, 130 Ohio St. 3d 360 (Ohio 2011).

Opinion

{¶ 1} The discretionary appeal is accepted.

{¶ 2} The cause is remanded to the court of appeals for application of State v. Williams, 129 Ohio St.3d 344, 2011-Ohio-3374, 952 N.E.2d 1108.

*361 Joseph T. Deters, Hamilton County Prosecuting Attorney, and Paula Adams, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee. Dinsmore & Shohl, L.L.P., and Michael J. Newman, Christopher R. McDowell, and Kurt R. Hunt, for appellant. O’Connor, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, Lanzinger, Cupp, and McGee Brown, JJ., concur. O’Donnell, J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Williams
2011 OH 3374 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2011)
State v. Williams
2011 Ohio 3374 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2011 Ohio 5787, 130 Ohio St. 3d 360, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-haynes-ohio-2011.