State v. Haynes

154 S.W.3d 1, 2004 Mo. App. LEXIS 1897, 2004 WL 2852950
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided December 14, 2004·No. No. ED 84071·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Earl Haynes (Defendant) appeals from the judgment upon his conviction by a jury for two counts each of sexual abuse in the first degree, Section 566.100, RSMo Supp. 1993 (Counts I and III); statutory sodomy in the first degree, Section 566.062, (Counts Y and VI); child molestation in the second degree, Section 566.068, (Counts VII and VIII); and statutory sodomy in the second degree, Section 566.064, RSMo 2000 (Counts IX and X) for which Defendant was sentenced to concurrent sentences of five years on each of the sexual abuse counts, twenty years on each of the first degree statutory sodomy counts, one year on each of the child molestation counts, and seven years on each of the second degree statutory sodomy counts. Defendant contests the sufficiency of the evidence to support his conviction on Counts III, IX, and X. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for them information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Haynes, 154 S.W.3d 1, 2004 Mo. App. LEXIS 1897, 2004 WL 2852950 (Mo. Ct. App. 2004).

154 S.W.3d 1 (State v. Haynes) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Haynes v. State
281 S.W.3d 926 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2009)