State v. Haynes

610 So. 2d 114, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 13346, 1992 WL 385369
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 30, 1992·No. No. 91-1859·Published

Opinion

WIGGINTON, Judge.

The state purports to bring this appeal from the imposition of an habitual felon sentence on the basis that the sentence is illegal. We disagree and grant Haynes’ motion to dismiss the appeal. While the state is entitled to appeal or cross appeal an illegal sentence pursuant to section 924.-07(l)(e), Florida Statutes, the instant sentence is not illegal. Cf. State v. Hohl, 431 So.2d 707 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983). Accordingly, the state’s appeal is hereby DISMISSED.

Turning to Haynes’ cross appeal, we hold that although it was error for the trial court to give the jury an instruction on flight,1 the error was harmless beyond any [115] reasonable doubt. Accordingly, Haynes’ judgment of conviction and sentence is AFFIRMED.

ERVIN and ZEHMER, JJ., concur.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Haynes, 610 So. 2d 114, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 13346, 1992 WL 385369 (Fla. Ct. App. 1992).

610 So. 2d 114 (State v. Haynes) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Keys v. State
606 So. 2d 669 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)
State v. Hohl
431 So. 2d 707 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1983)
Fenelon v. State
594 So. 2d 292 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1992)