State v. . Hayeslipps

155 S.E. 927, 199 N.C. 636, 1930 N.C. LEXIS 203
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedOctober 29, 1930
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 155 S.E. 927 (State v. . Hayeslipps) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. . Hayeslipps, 155 S.E. 927, 199 N.C. 636, 1930 N.C. LEXIS 203 (N.C. 1930).

Opinion

Stacy, C. J.

At tbe May Term, 1930, Forsyth Superior Court, the defendants herein, Percy Hayeslipps and Eobert Harris, were tried upon an indictment charging them with a capital offense, to wit, rape, which resulted in a .conviction of both the defendants, and sentences of death prononneed thereon. From the judgments thus entered, the defendants gave notice of appeal to the Supreme Court, but nothing has been done towards perfecting same.

As no error appears on the face of the record proper, the motion of the State must be allowed. S. v. Brumfield, 198 N. C., 613.

Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. . Rives
160 S.E. 287 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1931)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
155 S.E. 927, 199 N.C. 636, 1930 N.C. LEXIS 203, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-hayeslipps-nc-1930.