State v. Hayes

Court of Appeals of South Carolina·Decided January 11, 2017·No. 2017-UP-016·Unpublished

Opinion

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

David Junior Hayes, Appellant.

Appellate Case No. 2015-000905

Appeal From York County DeAndrea G. Benjamin, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2017-UP-016 Submitted October 1, 2016 – Filed January 11, 2017

AFFIRMED

Deputy Chief Appellate Defender Wanda H. Carter, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Assistant Attorney General Megan Harrigan Jameson, both of Columbia; and Solicitor Kevin S. Brackett, of York, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: Affirmed pursuant to Rule 220(b), SCACR, and the following authorities: State v. Dunbar, 356 S.C. 138, 142, 587 S.E.2d 691, 693 (2003) ("In order for an issue to be preserved for appellate review, it must have been raised to and ruled upon by the trial [court]."); id. at 142, 587 S.E.2d at 694 ("A party may not argue one ground at trial and an alternate ground on appeal.").

AFFIRMED.1

LOCKEMY, C.J., and KONDUROS and MCDONALD, JJ., concur.

1 We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Hayes, (S.C. Ct. App. 2017).

State v. Hayes (State v. Hayes) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Dunbar
587 S.E.2d 691 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 2003)