State v. Hayes

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Hayes

572 S.W.3d 165

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedApril 30, 2019

DocketWD 81607

StatusPublished

This text of 572 S.W.3d 165 (State v. Hayes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Hayes, 572 S.W.3d 165 (Mo. Ct. App. 2019).

Pincite

Opinion

Per curiam:

Appellant Carl Hayes ("Hayes") appeals his convictions of four counts of robbery in the first degree, section 569.020, and four counts of armed criminal action, section 571.015, following a jury trial in Jackson County Circuit Court. Hayes contends that *166the circuit court erred in denying his motion for judgment of acquittal because there was insufficient evidence upon which the jury could have believed a deadly weapon was used during the commissions of the robberies. For reasons explained more fully in a memorandum provided to the parties, we affirm. Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per curiam:

Appellant Carl Hayes ("Hayes") appeals his convictions of four counts of robbery in the first degree, section 569.020, and four counts of armed criminal action, section 571.015, following a jury trial in Jackson County Circuit Court. Hayes contends that *166the circuit court erred in denying his motion for judgment of acquittal because there was insufficient evidence upon which the jury could have believed a deadly weapon was used during the commissions of the robberies. For reasons explained more fully in a memorandum provided to the parties, we affirm. Rule 30.25(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

572 S.W.3d 165, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-hayes-moctapp-2019.