State v. Hayes

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Hayes

265 S.W.3d 350, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 1323, 2008 WL 4401412

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided September 30, 2008·No. ED 89828·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant, Jermaine Hayes, appeals from the judgment entered after a jury found him guilty of robbery in the first degree, attempted robbery in the first degree and two counts of armed criminal action. On appeal, defendant argues that the victims’ identifications of him were the result of impermissibly suggestive police procedures and this rendered the victims’ identifications unreliable.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. The parties have been provided with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant, Jermaine Hayes, appeals from the judgment entered after a jury found him guilty of robbery in the first degree, attempted robbery in the first degree and two counts of armed criminal action. On appeal, defendant argues that the victims’ identifications of him were the result of impermissibly suggestive police procedures and this rendered the victims’ identifications unreliable.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. The parties have been provided with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).

State v. Hayes, 265 S.W.3d 350, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 1323, 2008 WL 4401412 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008).

Pincite

265 S.W.3d 350 (State v. Hayes) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related