State v. Hayes
This text of 265 S.W.3d 350 (State v. Hayes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
Defendant, Jermaine Hayes, appeals from the judgment entered after a jury found him guilty of robbery in the first degree, attempted robbery in the first degree and two counts of armed criminal action. On appeal, defendant argues that the victims’ identifications of him were the result of impermissibly suggestive police procedures and this rendered the victims’ identifications unreliable.
No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. The parties have been provided with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
265 S.W.3d 350, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 1323, 2008 WL 4401412, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-hayes-moctapp-2008.