State v. Hayes

5 So. 2d 768, 199 La. 269, 1942 La. LEXIS 1107
Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided January 5, 1942·No. Nos. 36458, 36460.·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

FOURNET, Justice.

The object of these two applications for writs was to compel the district judge to grant the relator a preliminary hearing on charges by affidavits of slander and conspiracy to destroy public records, no indictment or information having been returned against him thereon, to determine whether or not there was any merit to the charges pending against him. It now appearing that this question has become moot for the reason, as pointed out in the district judge’s response to the rules nisi issued by us, that the affidavits in these two instances have been withdrawn, the relator discharged, and his appearance bonds cancelled, the rules nisi issued are recalled and the relator’s applications for writs dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Hayes, 5 So. 2d 768, 199 La. 269, 1942 La. LEXIS 1107 (La. 1942).

5 So. 2d 768 (State v. Hayes) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Jefferson v. Tennant
127 So. 2d 155 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1961)
Tullos v. Long
90 So. 2d 880 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1956)
Succession Washington
87 So. 2d 9 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1956)
Lachney v. Chance
84 So. 2d 871 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1956)
State ex rel. Jackson v. Madden
74 So. 2d 29 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1954)
Jefferson 7th Ward Social Club v. Grevemberg
73 So. 2d 777 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1954)