State v. Hawley

208 S.E.2d 383, 23 N.C. App. 223, 1974 N.C. App. LEXIS 2056
Court of Appeals of North Carolina·Decided October 2, 1974·No. No. 749SC574·Published

Opinion

MARTIN, Judge.

There is nothing in the record to disclose how the superior court obtained jurisdiction of this case. “The Court of Appeals will take notice ex mero motu of the failure of the record to show jurisdiction in the court entering the judgment appealed from.” State v. Byrd, 4 N.C. App. 672, 673, 167 S.E. 2d 522 (1969). It is the duty of the defendant appellant to see that the record on appeal is properly made up and transmitted to the Court of Appeals. State v. Parks, 20 N.C. App. 207, 200 S.E. 2d 837 (1973) ; State v. Marshall, 11 N.C. App. 200, 180 S.E. [224]*2242d 464 (1971) ; State v. Byrd, supra. The superior court has no jurisdiction to try an accused for a misdemeanor upon a warrant of the district court unless he is first tried and convicted for such misdemeanor in the district court and appeals to the superior court from the sentence imposed in the district court. State v. Parks, supra; State v. Marshall, supra; State v. Byrd, supra. For failure to show jurisdiction, the appeal must be dismissed. State v. Banks, 241 N.C. 572, 86 S.E. 2d 76 (1955); State v. Marshall, supra.

Appeal dismissed.

Chief Judge Brock and Judge Morris concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Hawley, 208 S.E.2d 383, 23 N.C. App. 223, 1974 N.C. App. LEXIS 2056 (N.C. Ct. App. 1974).

208 S.E.2d 383 (State v. Hawley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Parks
200 S.E.2d 837 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1973)
State v. Marshall
180 S.E.2d 464 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1971)
State v. Byrd
167 S.E.2d 522 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1969)
State v. Banks
86 S.E.2d 76 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1955)