State v. Hawkins

2004 Ohio 7124, 820 N.E.2d 931, 104 Ohio St. 3d 582
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided December 30, 2004·No. 2004-1299·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

{¶ 1} The discretionary appeal is accepted on Proposition of Law No. II.

{¶ 2} The cross-appeal is not accepted.

{¶ 3} The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed and the cause is remanded for application of State v. Leach, 102 Ohio St.3d 135, 2004-Ohio-2147, 807 N.E.2d 335.

Moyer, C.J., Resnick, Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton and O’Donnell, JJ., concur. F.E. Sweeney and O’Connor, JJ., dissent. *583 William D. Mason, Cuyahoga County Prosecuting Attorney, Lisa Reitz Williamson and Brian Mooney, Assistant Prosecuting Attorneys, for appellee and cross-appellant. Robert L. Tobik, Cuyahoga County Public Defender, and John T. Martin, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant and cross-appellee.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Hawkins, 2004 Ohio 7124, 820 N.E.2d 931, 104 Ohio St. 3d 582 (Ohio 2004).

2004 Ohio 7124 (State v. Hawkins) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Jackson, 88345 (6-14-2007)
2007 Ohio 2925 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2007)