State v. Hawkins

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Hawkins

460 S.W.3d 466, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 155, 2015 WL 658442

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided February 17, 2015·No. WD 76583·Published

Opinion

Order

Per Curiam

Following a jury trial, Dequan Hawkins appeals from his convictions for second degree murder and armed criminal action. Hawkins contends the circuit court erred in overruling his objection to the jury’s request to replay a witness’s videotaped interview during deliberations, because the videotape was testimonial and unfairly bolstered the witness’s statement. After a thorough review of the record, we find no error and affirm the judgment of convictions. A formal, published opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose; however, a memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision has been provided to the parties.

AFFIRMED. Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order

Per Curiam

Following a jury trial, Dequan Hawkins appeals from his convictions for second degree murder and armed criminal action. Hawkins contends the circuit court erred in overruling his objection to the jury’s request to replay a witness’s videotaped interview during deliberations, because the videotape was testimonial and unfairly bolstered the witness’s statement. After a thorough review of the record, we find no error and affirm the judgment of convictions. A formal, published opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose; however, a memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision has been provided to the parties.

AFFIRMED. Rule 30.25(b).

State v. Hawkins, 460 S.W.3d 466, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 155, 2015 WL 658442 (Mo. Ct. App. 2015).

Pincite

460 S.W.3d 466 (State v. Hawkins) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.