State v. Haven

827 N.E.2d 319, 105 Ohio St. 3d 418
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided May 25, 2005·No. Nos. 2004-1073 and 2004-1074·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

{¶ 1} The Court of Appeals for Wayne County certified the following question to this court: “Can an offender be convicted of a sexually violent predator specification without there being a separate, prior conviction for a sexually violent offense?”

{¶ 2} On the authority of State v. Smith, 104 Ohio St.3d 106, 2004-Ohio-6238, 818 N.E.2d 283, we answer the certified question in the negative. Therefore, the judgment of the court of appeals is reversed to the extent it is inconsistent with State v. Smith, appellant’s sexually-violent-predator specification conviction and sentence are vacated, and the cause is remanded to the trial court for resentencing consistent with State v. Smith.

Moyer, C.J., Resnick, Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor and Lanzinger, JJ., concur. O’Donnell, J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Haven, 827 N.E.2d 319, 105 Ohio St. 3d 418 (Ohio 2005).

827 N.E.2d 319 (State v. Haven) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Townsend (Slip Opinion)
2020 Ohio 5586 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2020)
State v. McCown, Unpublished Decision (11-16-2006)
2006 Ohio 6040 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2006)
State v. Haven, Unpublished Decision (6-28-2006)
2006 Ohio 3283 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2006)
State v. Huffman
847 N.E.2d 58 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2006)