State v. Hatfield
51 A. 1109, 67 N.J.L. 354, 38 Vroom 354, 1902 N.J. LEXIS 120
This text of 51 A. 1109 (State v. Hatfield) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
State v. Hatfield, 51 A. 1109, 67 N.J.L. 354, 38 Vroom 354, 1902 N.J. LEXIS 120 (N.J. 1902).
Opinion
Two eases with the above title were argued together.
The judgment in each of them is affirmed, for the reasons given in the per curiam opinion of the Supreme Court. 37 Vroom 443.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Van Syckel, Garretson, Fort, Garretson, Pitney, Krueger, Adams, Vredenburgh, Voorhees, Vroom. 12.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
State v. Sullivan
109 A.2d 430 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1954)
State v. Marinella
93 A.2d 620 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1952)
State v. Western Union Telegraph Co.
80 A.2d 342 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1951)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
51 A. 1109, 67 N.J.L. 354, 38 Vroom 354, 1902 N.J. LEXIS 120, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-hatfield-nj-1902.