State v. Hatfield
51 A. 1109, 67 N.J.L. 354, 38 Vroom 354, 1902 N.J. LEXIS 120
Opinion
Two eases with the above title were argued together.
The judgment in each of them is affirmed, for the reasons given in the per curiam opinion of the Supreme Court. 37 Vroom 443.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Van Syckel, Garretson, Fort, Garretson, Pitney, Krueger, Adams, Vredenburgh, Voorhees, Vroom. 12.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Hatfield, 51 A. 1109, 67 N.J.L. 354, 38 Vroom 354, 1902 N.J. LEXIS 120 (N.J. 1902).
51 A. 1109 (State v. Hatfield) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Sullivan
109 A.2d 430 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1954)
State v. Marinella
93 A.2d 620 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1952)
State v. Western Union Telegraph Co.
80 A.2d 342 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1951)