State v. Hatcher
This text of 2021 ND 224 (State v. Hatcher) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering North Dakota Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK OF SUPREME COURT DECEMBER 9, 2021 STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
2021 ND 224
State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee v. Justin Allen Hatcher, Defendant and Appellant
No. 20210137
Appeal from the District Court of Barnes County, Southeast Judicial District, the Honorable Jay A. Schmitz, Judge.
AFFIRMED.
Per Curiam.
Tonya Duffy, State’s Attorney, Valley City, N.D., for plaintiff and appellee; submitted on brief.
Richard E. Edinger, Fargo, N.D., for defendant and appellant; submitted on brief. State v. Hatcher No. 20210137
[¶1] Justin Hatcher appeals from a criminal judgment and an order denying his motion to withdraw guilty pleas. Hatcher argues the district court abused its discretion in concluding he failed to establish a fair and just reason why he should be allowed to withdraw his guilty pleas. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(4), concluding the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying his motion to withdraw guilty pleas.
[¶2] Jon J. Jensen, C.J. Gerald W. VandeWalle Daniel J. Crothers Lisa Fair McEvers Jerod E. Tufte
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2021 ND 224, 967 N.W.2d 785, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-hatcher-nd-2021.