State v. Hatch

Supreme Court of Connecticut

State v. Hatch

822 A.2d 244, 263 Conn. 920, 2003 Conn. LEXIS 202

CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut

DecidedMay 2, 2003

DocketSC 16991

StatusPublished

This text of 822 A.2d 244 (State v. Hatch) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Hatch, 822 A.2d 244, 263 Conn. 920, 2003 Conn. LEXIS 202 (Colo. 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 75 Conn. App. 615 (AC 22164), is granted, limited to the following issues:

“1. Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the defendant’s guilty plea was invalid because the trial court did not inform him, at the time of the plea, that his contemplated period of probation would require compliance with special conditions?

“2. If the answer to the first question is ‘yes,’ did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the trial court should have advised the defendant, at the sentencing, that he should consider withdrawing his plea?”

NORCOTT and KATZ, Js., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 75 Conn. App. 615 (AC 22164), is granted, limited to the following issues:

“1. Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the defendant’s guilty plea was invalid because the trial court did not inform him, at the time of the plea, that his contemplated period of probation would require compliance with special conditions?

“2. If the answer to the first question is ‘yes,’ did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the trial court should have advised the defendant, at the sentencing, that he should consider withdrawing his plea?”

NORCOTT and KATZ, Js., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

822 A.2d 244, 263 Conn. 920, 2003 Conn. LEXIS 202, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-hatch-conn-2003.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack