State v. Hatch

Supreme Court of Connecticut

State v. Hatch

822 A.2d 244, 263 Conn. 920, 2003 Conn. LEXIS 202

Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided May 2, 2003·No. SC 16991·Published

Opinion

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 75 Conn. App. 615 (AC 22164), is granted, limited to the following issues:

“1. Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the defendant’s guilty plea was invalid because the trial court did not inform him, at the time of the plea, that his contemplated period of probation would require compliance with special conditions?

“2. If the answer to the first question is ‘yes,’ did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the trial court should have advised the defendant, at the sentencing, that he should consider withdrawing his plea?”

NORCOTT and KATZ, Js., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 75 Conn. App. 615 (AC 22164), is granted, limited to the following issues:

“1. Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the defendant’s guilty plea was invalid because the trial court did not inform him, at the time of the plea, that his contemplated period of probation would require compliance with special conditions?

“2. If the answer to the first question is ‘yes,’ did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the trial court should have advised the defendant, at the sentencing, that he should consider withdrawing his plea?”

NORCOTT and KATZ, Js., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.

State v. Hatch, 822 A.2d 244, 263 Conn. 920, 2003 Conn. LEXIS 202 (Colo. 2003).

Pincite

822 A.2d 244 (State v. Hatch) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related