State v. Hastings

409 A.2d 141, 137 Vt. 643, 1979 Vt. LEXIS 1118
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Hastings. Read the opinion of the Court — 137 Vt. 631
Supreme Court of Vermont·Decided November 8, 1979·No. No. 401-79·Published

Opinion

Revocation of bail reversed; conditions of bail reinstated; cause remanded for further hearing if either party so indicates and for required findings consistent with the mandate of State v. Brown, 136 Vt. 561, 396 A.2d 134 (1978), that breach of conditions not only created a danger to the public, State v. Pray, 133 Vt. 537, 346 A.2d 227 (1975), but also as to the likelihood of nonappearance, State v. Churchill, 133 Vt. 338, 341 A.2d 22 (1975); see State v. Ranzona, 137 Vt. 634, 405 A.2d 1228 (1979) (Billings, J., presiding).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Hastings, 409 A.2d 141, 137 Vt. 643, 1979 Vt. LEXIS 1118 (Vt. 1979).

409 A.2d 141 (State v. Hastings) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Churchill
341 A.2d 22 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1975)
State v. Brown
396 A.2d 134 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1978)
State v. Pray
346 A.2d 227 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1975)
State v. Ranzona
405 A.2d 1228 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1979)