State v. Hastings

1926 OK 743, 252 P. 8, 122 Okla. 37, 1926 Okla. LEXIS 174
CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma
DecidedSeptember 21, 1926
Docket17196
StatusPublished

This text of 1926 OK 743 (State v. Hastings) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Hastings, 1926 OK 743, 252 P. 8, 122 Okla. 37, 1926 Okla. LEXIS 174 (Okla. 1926).

Opinion

BRANSON, V. C. J.

Herein an accusation was returned by the same grand jury and at the same time as that returned against the defendant in case No. 17198, entitled ‘‘The State of Oklahoma, Plaintiff in Error, v. George R. Childers. Defendant in Error,” this day decided (122 Okla. 64, 252 Pac. 6).

The grounds on which the accusation was quashed in the instant case were the same as in that ease, and the rules and reasons for reversing that case are applicable herein.

This cause is therefore reversed, with direction to the district court to reinstate the accusation and take such other proceedings as provided by law.

NIOHOLSON, C. J., and MASON, PHELPS, and HUNT, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Childers
1926 OK 741 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1926)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1926 OK 743, 252 P. 8, 122 Okla. 37, 1926 Okla. LEXIS 174, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-hastings-okla-1926.