State v. Haskins
This text of 509 A.2d 113 (State v. Haskins) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Judicial Court of Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION.
After a jury trial in Superior Court (Washington County) defendant John Has-kins was convicted of operating a motor vehicle after being found an habitual offender, 29 M.R.S.A. § 2298 (Supp.1985-1986), and of operating under the influence of intoxicating liquor, 29 M.R.S.A. § 1312-B (Supp.1985-1986). On appeal Haskins challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to support a finding that he had operated an automobile on the evening of his arrest. Viewing the testimony of witnesses in the light most favorable to the State, the jury could rationally find beyond a reasonable doubt every element of the offenses charged, including operation. See State v. Barry, 495 A.2d 825, 826 (Me.1985).
The entry is:
Judgments affirmed.
All concurring.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
509 A.2d 113, 1986 Me. LEXIS 792, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-haskins-me-1986.