State v. Harvey

382 A.2d 210, 135 Vt. 549, 1977 Vt. LEXIS 675
Supreme Court of Vermont·Decided December 6, 1977·No. 79-75·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This is a mandatory appeal, 13 V.S.A. § 7401; V.R.A.P. 3(b), from a conviction of first-degree murder, 13 V.S.A. §§ 2301, 2303, in the Caledonia Superior Court. Prior consideration of the appeal was delayed due to alleged gross inadequacies in the record. This Court, on motion, remanded the cause for determination of the accuracy of the record, V.R.A.P. 10(e), and ordered that a different judge preside over the proceedings on the remand in view of the probability that the judge who had presided at trial would be a necessary witness. See Isabelle v. Proctor Hospital, Inc., 132 Vt. 243, 246, 315 A.2d 241, 243 (1974).

The findings upon remand that have been reported to this Court reveal a record that is so fraught with error that a just review of the questions raised on appeal is impossible. Since any attempt to review the conviction might well result in a gross miscarriage of justice, a new trial will be granted. Wemyss v. Viens, 125 Vt. 81, 82, 211 A.2d 238, 239 (1965).

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Harvey, 382 A.2d 210, 135 Vt. 549, 1977 Vt. LEXIS 675 (Vt. 1977).

382 A.2d 210 (State v. Harvey) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Sage
641 A.2d 115 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1994)
State v. Lemire
640 A.2d 541 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1994)
Gionet v. Town of Goshen
566 A.2d 1349 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1989)
Rousse v. Town of Isle La Motte
479 A.2d 132 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1984)
Houston v. Town of Ferrisburg
470 A.2d 224 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1983)
In re Colbeth
415 A.2d 1333 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1980)