State v. Harvey
Opinion
This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date.
1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO
2 STATE OF NEW MEXICO
3 Plaintiff-Appellee,
4 v. NO. A-1-CA-36836
5 CHRISTOPHER HARVEY,
6 Defendant-Appellant,
7 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF BERNALILLO COUNTY 8 Benjamin Salvador Chavez, District Judge
9 Hector H. Balderas, Attorney General 10 Santa Fe, NM
11 for Appellee
12 McCleary & Richter-Freund, LLC 13 Mary McCleary 14 Albuquerque, NM
15 MEMORANDUM OPINION
16 HANISEE, Judge.
17 {1} Summary affirmance was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of
18 proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance has
19 been filed and the time for doing so has expired. 1 {2} AFFIRMED.
2 {3} IT IS SO ORDERED.
3 _______________________________ 4 J. MILES HANISEE, Judge
5 WE CONCUR:
6 _________________________________ 7 M. MONICA ZAMORA, Judge
8 _________________________________ 9 JULIE J. VARGAS, Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Harvey (State v. Harvey) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.