Home/Supreme Court of North Carolina/State v. Harvell

State v. Harvell

269 S.E.2d 626, 300 N.C. 200
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedMay 6, 1980
StatusPublished

This text of 269 S.E.2d 626 (State v. Harvell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Harvell, 269 S.E.2d 626, 300 N.C. 200 (N.C. 1980).

Opinion

269 S.E.2d 626 (1980)
300 N.C. 200

STATE of North Carolina
v.
Shelton Earl HARVELL.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

May 6, 1980.

Lucien Capone, III, Associate Atty. Gen., Raleigh, for State.

Frazier & Moore, Bowen C. Tatum, Jr., Jacksonville, for defendant.

*627 Defendant's notice of appeal and petition for discretionary review under G.S. § 731, 45 N.CApp. 243, 262 S.E.2d 850. Motion of the Attorney General to dismiss the appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question. Motion allowed; petition denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Harvell
262 S.E.2d 850 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1980)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
269 S.E.2d 626, 300 N.C. 200, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-harvell-nc-1980.