State v. Hartzell
This text of 230 P.3d 1054 (State v. Hartzell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Washington Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
STATE of Washington, Respondent,
v.
Charles Carroll HARTZELL, IV, Petitioner.
State of Washington, Respondent,
v.
Jeremy Ryan Tieskotter, Petitioner.
Supreme Court of Washington.
ORDER
¶ 1 Department I of the Court, composed of Chief Justice Madsen and Justices C. Johnson, Sanders, Owens and J. Johnson, considered at its April 27, 2010, Motion Calendar, whether review should be granted pursuant to RAP 13.4(b), and unanimously agreed that the following order be entered.
¶ 2 IT IS ORDERED:
¶ 3 That the Petitions for Review are granted only as to the firearms enhancement issue and the case is remanded to the Court of Appeals Division One for reconsideration in light of State v. Williams-Walker, 167 Wash.2d 889, 225 P.3d 913 (2010).
*1055 For the Court
/s/MADSEN, C.J. CHIEF JUSTICEFree access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
230 P.3d 1054, 168 Wash. 2d 1027, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-hartzell-wash-2010.