State v. Hartwick

290 N.W. 529, 228 Iowa 244
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Hartwick. Read the opinion of the Court — 228 Iowa 245
Supreme Court of Iowa·Decided March 5, 1940·No. No. 45033.·Published

Opinion

Hale, J.

The defendant was jointly indicted with her brother Harry, by the grand jury of Davis county, on the charge of subornation of perjury, which it was alleged occurred in a civil action brought against them by E. K. Bekman, for fees for services rendered as attorney in the trial of litigation in Davis county. The defendants were given separate trials. The objections made in the Harry Hartwick case are the same as made here, with some exceptions, and the discussion in that case will apply to the present case and we need not repeat it here. In the present case, however, there was no question of misconduct of the jury, the only assignments of error being as to the giving of certain instructions and the admission of testimony claimed to have been leading and suggestive. All these matters have been reviewed in the Harry Hartwick case and our conclusion in the present case is the same as in that.

The cause is, therefore, affirmed. — Affirmed.

Hamilton, C. J., and Stiger, Sager, Bliss, Mitchell, and Miller, JJ., concur. Richards and Oliver, JJ., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Hartwick, 290 N.W. 529, 228 Iowa 244 (iowa 1940).

290 N.W. 529 (State v. Hartwick) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.