Home/Texas Supreme Court/State v. Hartman

State v. Hartman

41 Tex. 562
CourtTexas Supreme Court
DecidedJuly 1, 1874
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 41 Tex. 562 (State v. Hartman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Hartman, 41 Tex. 562 (Tex. 1874).

Opinion

Devine, Associate Justice.

The indictment in this case was held defective, on motion to quash, because the indictment failed to charge that the assault and battery was unlawful, and because the indictment did not charge [563]*563that the offense was committed with intent to injure the party upon whom the assault and battery is alleged to have been made.

The indictment was not defective. (See The State v. Allen, 30 Tex., 60; The State v. Lutterloh, 22 Tex., 214, and State v. Hays, decided during this term.)

The court erred in sustaining defendant’s motion.

The judgment is reversed and the cause is remanded.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cromwell v. State
131 S.W. 595 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1910)
Milstead v. State
19 Tex. Ct. App. 490 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1885)
Ferguson v. State
4 Tex. Ct. App. 156 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1878)
Bronson v. State
2 Tex. Ct. App. 46 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1877)
Browning v. State
2 Tex. Ct. App. 47 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1877)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
41 Tex. 562, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-hartman-tex-1874.