State v. Hartman
This text of 67 Tenn. 384 (State v. Hartman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Tennessee Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
delivered the opinion of the court.
This was an indictment for trespass, under sec. 4652, sub-sec. 7, of the Code. The indictment was-quashed upon the authority of the case of Doter v. The State, 6 Col., 545. That indictment was in the language of the statute, as we infer from the opinion of the court, and it was held insufficient because it did not aver that defendant committed the trespass “knowingly and wilfully.”
In the present case the indictment is in the language of the statute, except that it avers that the trespass was “unlawfully” committed. To make the trespass “unlawful,” it must have been wilfully and [385]*385knowingly done. The case of Doler v. The State, therefore, is not applicable as authority for the quashing of the indictment.
We think the indictment was sufficient, and reverse the judgment.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
67 Tenn. 384, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-hartman-tenn-1875.