State v. Hartley

999 P.2d 560, 168 Or. App. 234, 2000 Ore. App. LEXIS 918
CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon
DecidedMay 31, 2000
DocketC980140MC; CA A104935
StatusPublished

This text of 999 P.2d 560 (State v. Hartley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Hartley, 999 P.2d 560, 168 Or. App. 234, 2000 Ore. App. LEXIS 918 (Or. Ct. App. 2000).

Opinion

PER CURIAM

In this civil commitment proceeding, appellant assigns error to the trial court’s failure to inform him of his right to subpoena witnesses. ORS 426.100(l)(d). The state concedes error, and we agree. State v. Grellert, 144 Or App 201, 925 P2d 161 (1996).

Reversed and remanded for further proceedings.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Grellert
925 P.2d 161 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1996)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
999 P.2d 560, 168 Or. App. 234, 2000 Ore. App. LEXIS 918, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-hartley-orctapp-2000.