State v. Hartley

522 A.2d 368, 1987 Me. LEXIS 681
CourtSupreme Judicial Court of Maine
DecidedMarch 24, 1987
StatusPublished

This text of 522 A.2d 368 (State v. Hartley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Judicial Court of Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Hartley, 522 A.2d 368, 1987 Me. LEXIS 681 (Me. 1987).

Opinion

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION.

On the single issue of sufficiency of the evidence, the Defendant, Harold Hartley, appealed from a judgment of conviction of three sexual offenses as a result of guilty findings in Superior Court, Somerset County. We are satisfied that the factfinder rationally could find all the elements of the three offenses. State v. Barry, 495 A.2d 825, 826 (Me.1985).

The entry is:

Judgment affirmed.

All concurring.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Barry
495 A.2d 825 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1985)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
522 A.2d 368, 1987 Me. LEXIS 681, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-hartley-me-1987.