State v. . Hart
This text of 197 S.E. 139 (State v. . Hart) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
There was ample evidence to be submitted to the jury. The defendant’s contention, made first at the trial, that he had lost the watch and that his wife had pawned the ring without his knowledge or consent were matters in defense rejected by the jury.
The warrant as amended is fully sufficient to charge the violation of C. S., sec. 4287, and defendant’s demurrer thereto cannot be sustained. Likewise, the court fully and correctly charged the law applicable to the evidence and the contentions based thereon. The defendant’s exceptions thereto cannot be sustained.
In the trial below we find
No error.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
197 S.E. 139, 213 N.C. 804, 1938 N.C. LEXIS 207, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-hart-nc-1938.