State v. Hart
Opinion
On June 28, 2005, the defendant was sentenced to five (5) years in the Montana Women’s Prison, for violation of the conditions of a deferred [37]*37sentence, for the offense of Fraudulently Obtaining Dangerous Drugs, a felony.
On April 7, 2006, the defendant’s application for review of that sentence was heard by the Sentence Review Division of the Montana Supreme Court.
The defendant was present and was represented by Jeff Olson. The state was represented by Karen Townsend who appeared telephonically.
Before hearing the application, the defendant was advised that the Sentence Review Division has the authority not only to reduce the sentence or affirm it, but also increase it. The defendant was further advised that there is no appeal from a decision of the Sentence Review Division. The defendant acknowledged that she understood this and stated that she wished to proceed.
Rule 17 of the Rules of the Sentence Review Division of the Supreme Court of Montana provides that “the sentence imposed by the District Court is presumed correct, and the sentence will not be reduced or increased unless it is deemed clearly inadequate or excessive.” (§46-18-904(3), MCA).
The Division finds that the reasons advanced for modification are insufficient to hold that the sentence imposed by the District Court is inadequate or excessive.
Therefore, it is the unanimous decision of the Sentence Review Division that the sentence shall be affirmed.
Done in open Court this 7 th day of April, 2006.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
335 Mont. 36 (State v. Hart) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.