State v. Hart

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Hart

472 S.W.3d 269, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 1054, 2015 WL 6160912

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedOctober 20, 2015

DocketNo. ED 101181

StatusPublished

This text of 472 S.W.3d 269 (State v. Hart) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Hart, 472 S.W.3d 269, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 1054, 2015 WL 6160912 (Mo. Ct. App. 2015).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM

Kenneth Randall Hart (Defendant) appeals from the judgment upon his convictions following a jury trial for three counts of first-degree statutory sodomy,- in violation of Section 566.062, RSMo 2000,¹ and one count of first-degree child molestation, in violation of Section’ 666.067. The trial court sentenced Defendant to terms of 20 years’ imprisonment on each of the statutory sodomy convictions and to 15 years’ imprisonment on the, child molestation conviction, all sentences to run. concurrently with the others. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law applicable to this case would serve no jurisprudential or precedential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b). " '■ ’ '

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM

Kenneth Randall Hart (Defendant) appeals from the judgment upon his convictions following a jury trial for three counts of first-degree statutory sodomy,- in violation of Section 566.062, RSMo 2000,¹ and one count of first-degree child molestation, in violation of Section’ 666.067. The trial court sentenced Defendant to terms of 20 years’ imprisonment on each of the statutory sodomy convictions and to 15 years’ imprisonment on the, child molestation conviction, all sentences to run. concurrently with the others. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law applicable to this case would serve no jurisprudential or precedential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b). " '■ ’ '

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

472 S.W.3d 269, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 1054, 2015 WL 6160912, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-hart-moctapp-2015.