State v. Hart

Supreme Court of Louisiana

State v. Hart

829 So. 2d 410, 2002 La. LEXIS 3359, 2002 WL 31557037

Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided November 12, 2002·No. No. 2002-KK-2747·Published

Opinion

In re Hart, Burnell Sr.; — Defendant; Applying for Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court Div. I, No. 427-717; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 2002-K-2225.

Writ granted. On the present record, we are unable to determine whether the trial court acted with knowledge of the witness’ restored competence. Therefore, this matter is remanded to the trial court for reconsideration of the motion for continuance in light of the apparently recently discovered evidence of the witness’ restored competence.

KIMBALL, J., would deny the writ. TRAYLOR, J., would deny the writ. KNOLL, J., would deny the writ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Hart, Burnell Sr.; — Defendant; Applying for Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court Div. I, No. 427-717; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 2002-K-2225.

Writ granted. On the present record, we are unable to determine whether the trial court acted with knowledge of the witness’ restored competence. Therefore, this matter is remanded to the trial court for reconsideration of the motion for continuance in light of the apparently recently discovered evidence of the witness’ restored competence.

KIMBALL, J., would deny the writ. TRAYLOR, J., would deny the writ. KNOLL, J., would deny the writ.

State v. Hart, 829 So. 2d 410, 2002 La. LEXIS 3359, 2002 WL 31557037 (La. 2002).

Pincite

829 So. 2d 410 (State v. Hart) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.