State v. Hart
This text of 587 A.2d 152 (State v. Hart) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The state of Connecticut’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 23 Conn. App. 746, is granted, limited to the following issues:
“1. Did the Appellate Court correctly rule that the state may not satisfy its burden of proving the defendant is not drug-dependent by destroying the credibility of defense witnesses, even though drug dependency is not an element of General Statutes § 21a-278 (b)?
“2. Was the Appellate Court correct in not considering facts elicited by the state during cross-examination when it determined there was insufficient evidence of non-drug-dependency?
“3. Did the Appellate Court correctly conclude that the trial court’s instructions were erroneous because [812]*812it instructed the jury to determine whether the defendant’s evidence of drug dependency was credible?”
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
587 A.2d 152, 217 Conn. 811, 1991 Conn. LEXIS 69, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-hart-conn-1991.