State v. . Harshaw

4 N.C. 230
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided July 5, 1815·Published

Opinion

Question for the Supreme Court: Is the defendant bound to pay the State's witnesses from the finding of the first bill until the nol. pros. was entered? We think it very clear that the defendant is liable to pay the witnesses for the whole time of attendance. The charge of which he was convicted was the same upon which the witnesses attended, and though the indictment was altered in point of form, yet neither the defendant nor the witnesses were discharged during the time. The latter were subpoenaed or recognized to give evidence against him on a specific charge; they did so, and he was convicted.

Cited: S. v. Johnson, 50 N.C. 223. *Page 178

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. . Harshaw, 4 N.C. 230 (N.C. 1815).

4 N.C. 230 (State v. . Harshaw) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. . Johnson
50 N.C. 221 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1858)