State v. Harrison
442 So. 2d 389, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 25116
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 14, 1983·No. No. 83-88·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
Based upon the authority of Novo v. Scott, 438 So.2d 477 (Fla. 3d DCA, 1983) we grant the state’s petition for certiorari and quash the trial court’s order which held that section 914.04, Florida Statutes (Supp.1982) is unconstitutional. We adopt the rationale of our sister court and “hold that section 914.04 is constitutional and affords a witness derivative-use immunity.” Novo v. Scott, supra.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Harrison, 442 So. 2d 389, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 25116 (Fla. Ct. App. 1983).
442 So. 2d 389 (State v. Harrison) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Mitrani
19 So. 3d 1065 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2009)
Menut v. State
446 So. 2d 718 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1984)