State v. Harrison

District Court of Appeal of Florida

State v. Harrison

442 So. 2d 389, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 25116

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedDecember 14, 1983

DocketNo. 83-88

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 442 So. 2d 389 (State v. Harrison) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Harrison, 442 So. 2d 389, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 25116 (Fla. Ct. App. 1983).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Based upon the authority of Novo v. Scott, 438 So.2d 477 (Fla. 3d DCA, 1983) we grant the state’s petition for certiorari and quash the trial court’s order which held that section 914.04, Florida Statutes (Supp.1982) is unconstitutional. We adopt the rationale of our sister court and “hold that section 914.04 is constitutional and affords a witness derivative-use immunity.” Novo v. Scott, supra.

HERSEY, HURLEY and WALDEN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Based upon the authority of Novo v. Scott, 438 So.2d 477 (Fla. 3d DCA, 1983) we grant the state’s petition for certiorari and quash the trial court’s order which held that section 914.04, Florida Statutes (Supp.1982) is unconstitutional. We adopt the rationale of our sister court and “hold that section 914.04 is constitutional and affords a witness derivative-use immunity.” Novo v. Scott, supra.

HERSEY, HURLEY and WALDEN, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

442 So. 2d 389, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 25116, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-harrison-fladistctapp-1983.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack