State v. Harris

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Harris. Read the opinion of the Court — 391 S.C. 539
Court of Appeals of South Carolina·Decided December 18, 2013·No. 2013-UP-477·Unpublished

Opinion

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Tito Harris, Appellant.

Appellate Case No. 2011-190108

Appeal From Berkeley County Deadra L. Jefferson, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2013-UP-477 Submitted September 1, 2013 – Filed December 18, 2013

APPEAL DISMISSED

Chief Appellate Defender Robert M. Dudek, of Columbia; and Tito Harris, pro se, for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General Donald J. Zelenka, both of Columbia, for Respondent. PER CURIAM: Dismissed after consideration of Appellant's pro se brief and review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.1

APPEAL DISMISSED.

FEW, C.J., and PIEPER and KONDUROS, JJ., concur.

1 We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Harris, (S.C. Ct. App. 2013).

State v. Harris (State v. Harris) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)