State v. Harris
688 P.2d 439, 70 Or. App. 353, 1984 Ore. App. LEXIS 4350
CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon
DecidedOctober 17, 1984
Docket83122732; CA A32408
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases
This text of 688 P.2d 439 (State v. Harris) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
State v. Harris, 688 P.2d 439, 70 Or. App. 353, 1984 Ore. App. LEXIS 4350 (Or. Ct. App. 1984).
Opinion
It is doubtful whether defendant’s exception to the jury’s instruction was sufficient to raise the question urged on appeal. Assuming that it was sufficient, the judgment is affirmed. State v. Kohlasch, 11 Or App 459, 502 P2d 1158 (1972).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cutright v. Weyerhaeuser Co.
702 P.2d 403 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1985)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
688 P.2d 439, 70 Or. App. 353, 1984 Ore. App. LEXIS 4350, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-harris-orctapp-1984.