State v. Harris
688 P.2d 439, 70 Or. App. 353, 1984 Ore. App. LEXIS 4350
Court of Appeals of Oregon·Decided October 17, 1984·No. 83122732; CA A32408·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
It is doubtful whether defendant’s exception to the jury’s instruction was sufficient to raise the question urged on appeal. Assuming that it was sufficient, the judgment is affirmed. State v. Kohlasch, 11 Or App 459, 502 P2d 1158 (1972).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Harris, 688 P.2d 439, 70 Or. App. 353, 1984 Ore. App. LEXIS 4350 (Or. Ct. App. 1984).
688 P.2d 439 (State v. Harris) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Cutright v. Weyerhaeuser Co.
702 P.2d 403 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1985)