State v. Harris, No. Cr90 57959 (Aug. 29, 2002)

Connecticut Superior Court

State v. Harris, No. Cr90 57959 (Aug. 29, 2002)

2002 Conn. Super. Ct. 11075

Connecticut Superior Court·Decided August 29, 2002·No. No. CR90 57959, CR91 006226T·Unpublished

Opinion

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION Acquittee's Motion to Dismiss State's Petition for Continued Commitment and Motion to Strike Psychiatric Security Review Board's Report to court are hereby DENIED.

State's Petition for Continued Commitment of James Harris is hereby GRANTED. Utilizing the standard of burden of proof set forth in State v.Metz, 230 Conn. 400 (1994), the court finds after hearing and review of all exhibits that the State has proven by clear and convincing evidence that the acquittee is mentally ill to the extent that his discharge at this time would constitute a danger to himself or others and that his continued commitment is in the best protection of society.

Accordingly, the court recommits Mr. Harris for a period of time not to exceed five years.

The Court,

________________ Maiocco, Judge CT Page 11076

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION Acquittee's Motion to Dismiss State's Petition for Continued Commitment and Motion to Strike Psychiatric Security Review Board's Report to court are hereby DENIED.

State's Petition for Continued Commitment of James Harris is hereby GRANTED. Utilizing the standard of burden of proof set forth in State v.Metz, 230 Conn. 400 (1994), the court finds after hearing and review of all exhibits that the State has proven by clear and convincing evidence that the acquittee is mentally ill to the extent that his discharge at this time would constitute a danger to himself or others and that his continued commitment is in the best protection of society.

Accordingly, the court recommits Mr. Harris for a period of time not to exceed five years.

The Court,

________________ Maiocco, Judge CT Page 11076

State v. Harris, No. Cr90 57959 (Aug. 29, 2002), 2002 Conn. Super. Ct. 11075 (Colo. Ct. App. 2002).

Pincite

2002 Conn. Super. Ct. 11075 (State v. Harris, No. Cr90 57959 (Aug. 29, 2002)) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related