State v. Harris, No. Cr90 57959 (Aug. 29, 2002)

2002 Conn. Super. Ct. 11075
CourtConnecticut Superior Court
DecidedAugust 29, 2002
DocketNo. CR90 57959, CR91 006226T
StatusUnpublished

This text of 2002 Conn. Super. Ct. 11075 (State v. Harris, No. Cr90 57959 (Aug. 29, 2002)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut Superior Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Harris, No. Cr90 57959 (Aug. 29, 2002), 2002 Conn. Super. Ct. 11075 (Colo. Ct. App. 2002).

Opinion

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION
Acquittee's Motion to Dismiss State's Petition for Continued Commitment and Motion to Strike Psychiatric Security Review Board's Report to court are hereby DENIED.

State's Petition for Continued Commitment of James Harris is hereby GRANTED. Utilizing the standard of burden of proof set forth in State v.Metz, 230 Conn. 400 (1994), the court finds after hearing and review of all exhibits that the State has proven by clear and convincing evidence that the acquittee is mentally ill to the extent that his discharge at this time would constitute a danger to himself or others and that his continued commitment is in the best protection of society.

Accordingly, the court recommits Mr. Harris for a period of time not to exceed five years.

The Court,

________________ Maiocco, Judge CT Page 11076

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Metz
645 A.2d 965 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1994)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2002 Conn. Super. Ct. 11075, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-harris-no-cr90-57959-aug-29-2002-connsuperct-2002.