State v. Harris

182 S.E.2d 827, 12 N.C. App. 272, 1971 N.C. App. LEXIS 1343
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Harris. Read the opinion of the Court — 10 N.C. App. 553
Court of Appeals of North Carolina·Decided August 18, 1971·No. No. 712SC376·Published

Opinion

MORRIS, Judge.

Appellant first contends that the imposition of a greater sentence in Superior Court than he received in District Court violated his constitutional rights under the State and Federal Constitutions. For the reasons stated in State v. Sparrow, 276 N.C. 499, 173 S.E. 2d 897 (1970), and State v. Spencer, 276 N.C. 535, 173 S.E. 2d 765 (1970), this contention is without merit.

Defendant’s remaining assignment of error is directed to the charge of the court. Although this assignment of error is listed as a “question presented” in the brief, appellant’s brief presents no argument nor authority in support of his contention. This assignment of error is, therefore, deemed abandoned. Rule [274]*27428, Rules of Practice in the Court of Appeals of North Carolina; State v. Norman, 8 N.C. App. 239, 174 S.E. 2d 41 (1970).

No error.

Judges Britt and Parker concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Harris, 182 S.E.2d 827, 12 N.C. App. 272, 1971 N.C. App. LEXIS 1343 (N.C. Ct. App. 1971).

182 S.E.2d 827 (State v. Harris) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Sparrow
173 S.E.2d 897 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1970)
State v. Spencer
173 S.E.2d 765 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1970)
State v. Norman
174 S.E.2d 41 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1970)