State v. Harris

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Harris

543 S.W.3d 76

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedMarch 13, 2018

DocketNo. ED 106003

StatusPublished

This text of 543 S.W.3d 76 (State v. Harris) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Harris, 543 S.W.3d 76 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM

The State of Missouri filed this interlocutory appeal pursuant to Section 547.200 RSMo 2000 challenging the trial court's Order granting Norvell Harris' motion to suppress evidence and statements. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law applicable to this case would serve no jurisprudential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM

The State of Missouri filed this interlocutory appeal pursuant to Section 547.200 RSMo 2000 challenging the trial court's Order granting Norvell Harris' motion to suppress evidence and statements. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law applicable to this case would serve no jurisprudential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

543 S.W.3d 76, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-harris-moctapp-2018.