State v. Harris

400 S.W.3d 865, 2013 WL 2643500, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 698
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedJune 11, 2013
DocketNo. ED 98379
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 400 S.W.3d 865 (State v. Harris) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Harris, 400 S.W.3d 865, 2013 WL 2643500, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 698 (Mo. Ct. App. 2013).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Lamarr Harris (Defendant) appeals the judgment of the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis convicting him of second-degree domestic assault. Defendant asserts that the trial court erred in: (1) denying his motion for new trial because defense counsel had an actual conflict of interest; and (2) sentencing him as a prior offender and prior domestic violence offender in violation of Sections 558.016 and 565.063.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and no error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, prepared a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
400 S.W.3d 865, 2013 WL 2643500, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 698, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-harris-moctapp-2013.